Carry-On (2024) Reviews: Everything You Need to Know About Netflix’s Biggest Hit of the Year

Carry-On (2024)

Netflix dropped Carry-On on December 13, 2024, and the internet immediately lit up. Within ten days of release, the film had racked up 97 million views. By January 2025, it had climbed to become the fifth-most-watched English-language film in Netflix history with over 149.5 million views. That’s not a small deal. That’s a cultural moment. But does the movie actually deserve the attention? That’s what this comprehensive review breakdown is here to answer.

Read  More: The Gentlemen (2024 TV Series): Everything You Need to Know

What Is Carry-On (2024)?

Carry-On is a Netflix original action thriller directed by Jaume Collet-Serra (The Shallows, Non-Stop, Run All Night) and written by T.J. Fixman, a former Insomniac Games writer. The film is rated PG-13, runs 1 hour and 59 minutes, and was produced by DreamWorks Pictures and Amblin Entertainment as part of their multi-film deal with Netflix.

The premise is deliciously simple. Ethan Kopek (Taron Egerton) is a TSA agent at LAX who finds out his girlfriend Nora (Sofia Carson) is pregnant on the same day he gets blackmailed into letting a dangerous package slip through airport security. The mysterious antagonist known only as “the Traveler” (Jason Bateman) controls Ethan through an earpiece, threatening to kill Nora if Ethan doesn’t comply. Meanwhile, LAPD detective Elena Cole (Danielle Deadwyler) is independently investigating a double homicide that connects to the same threat. The dangerous package, it turns out, contains Novichok a lethal nerve agent capable of killing hundreds.

The setting is Christmas Eve. The stakes are enormous. And the tension starts almost immediately.

The Cast: Who’s In It and How Do They Do?

Taron Egerton as Ethan Kopek Egerton plays Ethan as a man in a rut. He’s likable, physically capable, and carries genuine emotional weight when the story calls for it. Critics have been split on whether he fully commands the screen as a leading man in this kind of thriller. Roger Ebert’s website praised him as “an effective Taron Egerton” who “consciously chooses to go understated.” Screen Rant noted the film sometimes feels like a “movie star test” for Egerton figuring out whether he’s this kind of guy or that kind. The consensus leans favorable: he’s relatable, believable, and carries the movie through its messier stretches.

Jason Bateman as the Traveler This is the casting that most people were most curious about, and by most accounts it pays off. Bateman, known almost exclusively for comedic and dramatic work on Ozark and Arrested Development, plays the villain with cold menace. He reportedly signed on immediately after reading the script. Deadline described him as making “a meal out of his villain role.” The Deadline review also noted a missed opportunity the film needed sharper dialogue between Ethan and the Traveler to elevate the dynamic to something truly memorable. Still, Bateman is clearly having fun, and it shows.

Sofia Carson as Nora Carson’s role is largely reactive. She’s the motivation, the emotional anchor, and the person in danger. Multiple reviewers noted that her character felt underdeveloped, describing her as “flat.” That’s a fair criticism. She’s serviceable but the script doesn’t give her much room.

Danielle Deadwyler as Detective Elena Cole Deadwyler does heavy lifting in holding the film’s B-plot together. The Roger Ebert review singled her out specifically, noting she elevates the more extreme aspects of the film. Some IMDb reviewers felt her character undergoes a jarring tonal shift halfway through the movie, going from realistic and clumsy to implausible action hero. It’s a valid critique, though Deadwyler’s performance itself remains strong.

Supporting Cast Theo Rossi as “the Watcher” (the villain’s surveillance operative), Dean Norris as Ethan’s supervisor Phil Sarkowski, Logan Marshall-Green as Agent Alcott, and Tonatiuh as Mateo Flores (the passenger carrying the nerve agent) all contribute solidly within their limited screen time.

Plot Summary (Spoiler-Light)

Ethan starts Christmas Eve by volunteering for a more demanding shift, hoping to impress his boss and reapply for the police academy. What he gets instead is an earpiece dropped by a stranger, a chilling voice in his ear, and the worst possible moral dilemma: let one bag through and save his girlfriend, or refuse and watch her die while hundreds of innocents escape harm.

The script was designed by Fixman as a version of the classic trolley problem a philosophical thought experiment about sacrificing one to save many. It’s a smart structural hook, and for the first half of the film, it generates real tension. The second half, as multiple reviews note, gets sillier and more implausible. Logic takes a back seat. Coincidences pile up. But by that point, many viewers have already bought in emotionally.

The film ends with Ethan managing to outwit the Traveler, defuse the Novichok threat, and survive though the exact mechanics of how involve some genuinely eyebrow-raising plot gymnastics. Netflix’s own breakdown of the ending confirms the resolution is intentionally designed to feel earned rather than realistic.

Critical Reception: What Do the Critics Say?

Carry-On earned an 88% on Rotten Tomatoes from 107 critics, with the site’s consensus calling Egerton and Bateman “great adversaries” in a “throwback thriller that clears all checkpoints of plot logic with its confident execution.” Metacritic gives it a 69 out of 100 “generally favorable.”

Here’s how major outlets landed:

  • Roger Ebert (RogerEbert.com): Praised the film’s “refined simplicity” and called it potentially the best Christmas movie of 2024. Acknowledged it’s too long and too silly but argues that’s almost beside the point.
  • Digital Trends: Called it “a propulsive and immensely fun new holiday thriller.” Gave props to Jason Bateman’s casting and Collet-Serra’s direction, while flagging a familiar story and some logic-stretching twists as negatives.
  • Screen Rant: More measured. Noted the film gets “more fun as it dumbs down” a backhanded compliment, but still a compliment.
  • Deadline: Praised the production elements and editing as “first-rate.” Called it derivative but entertaining.
  • Empire Magazine: Gave it 75/100, calling it “Die Hard karaoke” that “delivers and eclipses at least two of John McClane’s outings.”
  • Metacritic critics: Multiple reviewers called it “dramatically satisfying” with twists that land cleanly.

What Audiences Think: Real Viewer Reviews

The critical praise didn’t fully carry over to general audiences, and that split is genuinely interesting. IMDb gives Carry-On a 6.5 out of 10 from over 190,000 ratings decent, but noticeably below the critics’ enthusiasm.

Common audience complaints include:

  • Too many coincidences. One of the most-upvoted IMDb reviews specifically counts 20+ situations that depend on “perfect coincidence” to work. An empty LAX on Christmas Eve. Empty bathrooms. Villains finding targets across the airport by luck.
  • Plot holes and lazy writing. The film’s solutions to its own problems have frustrated viewers who feel the script earned its way out of tight situations too easily.
  • Flat supporting characters. Nora’s character is frequently cited as underdeveloped. Viewers wanted more from her than being a plot device.
  • Comparison to Die Hard doesn’t fully hold up. Many viewers who came in expecting a Die Hard-level thriller felt slightly let down, even if they still enjoyed the film.

On the positive side:

  • Jason Bateman’s performance is almost universally praised in audience reviews.
  • The fight and action choreography, especially given the airport setting, gets props for creativity.
  • Many viewers appreciated that the main characters don’t make stupid decisions a rarity in the genre.
  • Several reviewers specifically called out the film as great “turn your brain off” entertainment without shame.

The AVForums review captured it well, calling it “a goofily fun, action thrill-ride” that leans into its own absurdity in a way that ultimately works for most people.

How Does It Compare to Die Hard?

Everyone’s going to make this comparison, so let’s address it directly. Carry-On is set during Christmas, features a single-location thriller structure, and involves an everyman protagonist fighting back against professional criminals. The Die Hard DNA is obvious.

But there are real differences. John McClane is a seasoned cop who actively fights back from minute one. Ethan Kopek is a TSA agent a genuinely novel hero for this genre who spends much of the film trying to avoid confrontation while buying time. The moral stakes in Carry-On are also more philosophically interesting than Die Hard‘s setup, even if the execution doesn’t fully capitalize on that.

Empire Magazine’s line that it “eclipses at least two of John McClane’s outings” is probably the highest possible praise Carry-On can realistically claim.

Director Jaume Collet-Serra: A Return to Form

Collet-Serra spent several years making big-budget franchise movies (Jungle Cruise, Black Adam) after a strong run of Liam Neeson action thrillers. Neither of those big swings connected critically or commercially the way his mid-budget genre work did.

Carry-On is a confident return to what he does best: tight pacing, controlled tension, and a clear understanding of how to escalate stakes within a confined setting. The Roger Ebert review explicitly called it “fully back in his wheelhouse.” The editing team of Fred Raskin, Elliot Greenberg, and Krisztian Majdik deserves significant credit as well this is a movie that could easily have felt slow or slack, and it doesn’t.

Streaming Details and Availability

  • Where to watch: Netflix (globally)
  • Release date: December 13, 2024
  • Runtime: 1 hour 59 minutes (119 minutes)
  • Rating: PG-13 (strong violence, bloody images, some language and suggestive references)
  • Audio/Video quality: Available in 4K UHD, Dolby Vision, and Dolby Atmos on supported devices
  • Language: English

The film was produced by DreamWorks Pictures and Amblin Entertainment. Despite the Amblin banner, Steven Spielberg’s studio’s involvement is more financial than creative here.

Is Carry-On Worth Watching?

If you want a tight, well-directed action thriller with a clever premise, a committed villain performance from Jason Bateman, and don’t require ironclad plot logic yes, absolutely. It’s ideal couch viewing. You don’t need to be in a festive mood to enjoy it, though the Christmas setting adds some atmosphere.

If you’re looking for something on the level of Die Hard or Speed a genre-defining thriller with iconic characters and quotable moments — you might walk away a little underwhelmed.

The film knows what it is. It’s a B-movie with A-list talent, directed with precision, and built to entertain. For a Netflix original, that’s more than enough.

Frequently Asked Questions About Carry-On (2024)

How long is Carry-On (2024)? Carry-On runs 1 hour and 59 minutes (119 minutes total).

Where can I watch Carry-On?

It’s available exclusively on Netflix globally. You’ll need an active Netflix subscription to stream it.

Is Carry-On based on a true story?

No. It’s a fictional thriller written by T.J. Fixman. The premise was conceptually inspired by the trolley problem a philosophical ethical dilemma rather than any real event.

Is Carry-On appropriate for kids?

It carries a PG-13 rating for strong violence, bloody images, some language, and suggestive references. Common Sense Media recommends it for ages 12 and up, though many parents suggest waiting until 14–15 for more sensitive viewers. There are scenes involving threats, hand-to-hand combat, gunfire, and discussion of nerve agents.

What is in the carry-on bag in the movie?

The mysterious carry-on bag contains Novichok, a real-world lethal nerve agent. The film reveals this about halfway through, raising the stakes significantly.

Is there a sequel planned for Carry-On?

As of early 2025, no sequel has been officially announced. However, the film’s massive viewership numbers (149.5 million views and counting) make it a strong candidate. Some IMDb reviewers have expressed genuine interest in a follow-up centered on Ethan Kopek as a police officer. Netflix hasn’t confirmed anything yet.

Who plays the villain in Carry-On?

Jason Bateman plays the antagonist, known only as “the Traveler.” It’s an against-type role for Bateman, who is far better known for comedy and dramatic roles in Arrested Development and Ozark.

Was Carry-On actually filmed at LAX?

No. Despite being set at LAX, the film was shot almost entirely in New Orleans, Louisiana, using a dormant airport as the stand-in location.

How did the TSA respond to the movie?

The TSA officially noted that the film contains inaccuracies about airport security procedures. However, the agency praised the filmmakers for portraying a TSA officer as a heroic figure something that doesn’t happen often in Hollywood.

How does Carry-On compare to Die Hard?

The comparison is inevitable and somewhat fair both are Christmas-set thrillers with an everyman hero up against professional criminals in a single location. But Carry-On features a TSA agent rather than a veteran cop, and leans more heavily on moral dilemma than action set pieces. Critics generally call it a solid B-movie in the Die Hard tradition rather than a true rival to the original.

What is the Traveler’s motivation in Carry-On?

The Traveler is a mercenary hired to get the Novichok onto a specific flight. His motivations are professional rather than personal he’s being paid, not driven by ideology. The film intentionally keeps his backstory opaque, which works for some viewers and frustrates others.

Is Carry-On a Christmas movie?

It takes place on Christmas Eve and uses the holiday setting deliberately. Whether it “counts” as a Christmas movie is the kind of debate that will probably outlast the film itself. Empire Magazine joked that viewers should “look forward to future eye-rolling debates” on exactly this question.

What is the Novichok threat in the movie?

Is it realistic? Novichok is a real class of nerve agents developed in the Soviet Union and used in high-profile poisonings. The film’s depiction of it as a liquid in a suitcase is loosely plausible as a delivery method, though security experts would have significant objections to many of the specifics. The film uses it more as a narrative device than a technical manual.

How many views did Carry-On get on Netflix?

Within its first week, it earned more views than any other Netflix film released in 2024. By January 2025, it had surpassed 149.5 million views, making it the fifth-most-watched English-language Netflix film of all time.

What are the main criticisms of Carry-On?

The most consistent criticisms are: too many coincidences in the plot, an underdeveloped supporting cast (especially Sofia Carson’s character Nora), a second half that loses the tension the first half builds carefully, and some implausible resolution mechanics. Audience scores on IMDb and Rotten Tomatoes’s Popcornmeter (52%) run notably lower than the 88% critical Tomatometer.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *